More than four decades after the Tehran hostage crisis, arbitration may offer Iran a legal pathway to challenge the United States’ latest military campaign. On 28 February 2026, the United States, together with Israel, launched a large-scale military operation against the Islamic Republic of Iran under the name “Operation Epic Fury”.[1] The United States has […]
News
Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala
Third-party funding is increasingly common in investment arbitration. It can give investors access to treaty claims, but it may also raise issues of conflicts of interest, confidentiality, security for costs and adverse costs exposure.[1] The procedural orders in Daniel W. Kappes and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates v. Republic of Guatemala are useful because they address […]
Investment Arbitration in Mexico: Why an Over USD 2.1 Billion Claim Failed
The arbitration in Espíritu Santo Holdings, LP and L1bre Holding, LLC v. United Mexican States concerned a digital taximeter project in Mexico City and claims exceeding USD 2.1 billion.[1] On 26 March 2026, the tribunal reportedly dismissed all claims in favour of Mexico.[2] The case arose from an investment in Servicios Digitales Lusad, S. de […]
New 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules
The International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) has approved a revised version of its Rules of Arbitration, which will enter into force on 1 June 2026 (“2026 ICC Rules”), replacing the 2021 Rules of Arbitration (“2021 ICC Rules”). The revisions are designed to improve efficiency, clarity and user-friendliness, ensuring ICC arbitration remains responsive to global user […]
Arbitration in Próspera: An Arbitration Utopia?
Arbitration is usually a creature of contract. Parties arbitrate because they have agreed to do so. Próspera ZEDE departs from that model by embedding arbitration into its legal architecture, making it the default mechanism for a significant category of disputes even when the parties’ contract is silent. It also creates two distinct tracks: a private, […]
Timing of Jurisdictional Objections in Arbitration
Arbitration rewards procedural vigilance. A party that believes a tribunal lacks jurisdiction usually cannot stay silent, contest the merits, and only later invoke the objection if the case turns unfavourable. Typical jurisdictional objections that may be raised in arbitration include: No valid arbitration agreement; A party is not bound by the arbitration agreement; The tribunal […]
Law 2540/2025: A Significant Expansion of Arbitral Power
Colombia has adopted one of the most ambitious arbitration reforms in recent years. Law 2540/2025 introduces arbitration for enforcement proceedings (arbitraje para procesos ejecutivos), and, in doing so, extends arbitration beyond adjudication into an area traditionally associated with courts. The law’s stated objective is to contribute to the decongestion of the judicial system, but its […]
Aceris Law Secures ICC Emergency Arbitrator Order Against an African State
Aceris Law is pleased to report a recent success in ICC emergency arbitration proceedings, in which our team secured a comprehensive emergency arbitrator order against an African State. The case involved a significant dispute arising out of a long-term investment and operational agreement in a critical public sector. Faced with escalating measures threatening our client’s […]
Aceris Law Recognised in the GAR 100 (19th Edition) as a Leading International Arbitration Law Firm
Aceris Law is pleased to announce its inclusion in the GAR 100 (19th Edition), further confirming its position as a leading international arbitration law firm handling high-stakes cross-border disputes. The ranking reflects the continued trust placed in the firm by clients involved in complex, multi-jurisdictional matters. A Global Practice Focused on Complex Disputes Founded in […]
