The ICC Dispute Resolution 2025 Statistics are more than an annual scorecard. They show a global, institutionally active arbitration system that is also becoming increasingly regional and efficiency-focused. Questions of diversity, procedure and award quality are also greatly influencing the arbitration system. Nowadays, the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) represents the interests “of more than […]
News
Deepfakes in International Arbitration
Deepfakes may soon become a practical problem for international arbitration. Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into arbitral procedure and decision-making, as discussed in a previous Aceris Law note on LaPaglia v. Valve. AI tools are frequently praised for their capacity to produce large volumes of text, images, audio and video within seconds. Yet […]
French Court of Cassation Limits Enforcement Against State-Linked Assets Where EU Stability Objectives Are at Stake
On 17 June 2026, the First Civil Chamber of the French Cour de cassation (“Court of Cassation”) (English version of decision here) drew an important boundary around enforcement against assets of State-linked entities. The Court accepted the general French-law principle that a creditor of a foreign State may, in certain circumstances, enforce against assets held […]
Ukraine v. Russia UNCLOS Award on Environment and Navigation
On 22 April 2026, an Annex VII arbitral tribunal issued its Award in Ukraine v. Russian Federation, a major law-of-the-sea arbitration concerning coastal State rights in the Black Sea, the Sea of Azov, and the Kerch Strait. The arbitration was brought under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS”), with the […]
Russian Court Refuses Recognition and Enforcement of LCIA Awards Against RUSAL on Public Order Grounds
On 28 May 2026, the Arbitrazh Court of the Kaliningrad Region refused to recognise and enforce two LCIA awards rendered against RTI Limited (“RTI”) and International Company Public Joint Stock Company United Company RUSAL (“RUSAL”) in favour of OWH SE i.L. (“OWH”). The court rejected OWH’s procedural objections, holding that RUSAL, although a debtor under […]
Nina Jankovic Named Lexology Construction Future Leader
Aceris Law is pleased to announce that Nina Jankovic, Counsel at Aceris Law, has been ranked as a Future Leader in Lexology Index: Construction, recognising her work in international construction arbitration and complex cross-border construction disputes. This recognition is meaningful because Lexology Index research draws on detailed market feedback from clients, corporate counsel and leading […]
Blasket v. Spain: Limits on Sovereign Asset Discovery
On 12 June 2026, Judge Beryl A. Howell of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a post-judgment discovery order in Blasket Renewable Investments, LLC v. Kingdom of Spain, a long-running enforcement proceeding arising from an ICSID award against Spain. The decision matters because it confirms both the breadth and the […]
Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?
Arbitration clauses are not always challenged directly. Often, the challenge is more subtle: a claimant brings court proceedings against both the contractual counterparty and an additional defendant who never signed the arbitration agreement, i.e., a non-signatory or third party. The question then becomes whether that party structure is enough to keep the dispute in court. […]
Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs
In DTH v DTF [2026] SGHC(I) 5, the Singapore International Commercial Court (“SICC”) dismissed an application by successful arbitral claimants to set aside or remit the costs portion of a Singapore-seated arbitral award. The applicants had won the merits phase of the arbitration but failed before the arbitral majority to recover their third-party funding costs […]
