Most arbitration rules of the leading arbitration institutions have today introduced the possibility of appointing an Emergency Arbitrator who will decide on Interim Measures (including the ICC, the LCIA, the SIAC, the HKIAC and the SCC). These rules are being increasingly used by parties to request interim measures. The Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber […]
Commercial Arbitration
国际投资仲裁中投资者的胜诉率
投资者－东道国模式下的国际投资仲裁案件逐年增多，逐渐成为国际诉讼的重要组成部分。外国投资者常常使用该法律武器应对投资东道国不平等，甚至恶意地对待 。虽然使用该法律武器的成本极高，投资者平均需要支付五百万美元的仲裁费用和律师费用，但是在行内人俗称的纽约公约也就是1958年签署的《承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》和1965年签署的《关于解决国家与其他国家国民之间投资争端公约》，俗称华盛顿公约的保驾护航下，但凡国际仲裁庭裁定投资者胜诉并给予赔偿时，极大多数的东道国都会主动履行。所以该法律保护机制还是相当有效的。那么在国际投资仲裁中投资者的胜诉率如何呢。 许多的国际仲裁案件信息是机密的，根据某网站[1]上搜集到的案件信息情况来看（截止至写稿日2016年4月7日），裁判庭最终认定有利投资者的占26.4%而有利国家的则为36.4%，还有约十分之一的案件中途停止，大约四分之一的和解案件，最后的一小部分是中立判决，即虽然认定国家违背国际条约但是没有划给投资者任何赔偿。 具体来看投资者不同主张的胜诉率：投资者方共提出392起非法征收的主张（直接征收75起，间接征收317起），然而仅58起被仲裁庭承认（直接征收15起，间接征收43起），故而成功率仅为14.7%；关于违背公平与公正待遇的主张共有347起，而被仲裁庭承认的仅86件，故而成功率为24.7%；关于违背全面安全与保护的主张共有183起，而被仲裁庭认定的仅15起，故而成功率仅为8%；主张违背国民待遇的共有98起，而认定的仅8起，故而成功率也仅有8%；主张违背最惠国待遇的共有77起，而成功认定的仅有两件（笔者对该数据有一定的怀疑）。以上数据来自网络，笔者对其准确严谨性有所保留，仅为读者提供大致参考信息。 邓玉华, Aceris Law [1] http://investmentpolicyhub.unctad.org/ISDS/FilterByBreaches
Aceris Law Cited As Key Player Of Swiss International Arbitration Law Firms
Aceris Law has been cited as a key player among Swiss international arbitration law firms in the International Report and Directory Series of 2015-2016. Among Swiss international arbitration law firms, Aceris is unique, offering excellent international arbitration legal representation at far more competitive rates than were traditionally available. According to Aceris founder William Kirtley, “We […]
Chinese Arbitration Framework
The Chinese Arbitration Framework within which the arbitration is conducted consists of the law, the judicial interpretation and international treaties. First, the laws adopted by the legislature, in particular the 1994 Chinese Arbitration Law, are the most important sources in relation to the Chinese Arbitration Framework. Second, in relation to the judicial interpretation, it is […]
Olivier Marquais Publishes Article on Article 35 of the ICC Rules of Arbitration in the Revue de l’Arbitrage
Olivier Marquais has published a new article in the Revue de l’Arbitrage, one of the oldest and most highly-esteemed French journals focusing on international arbitration. An ICC arbitral award is final and as a matter of principle not subject to review. However, Article 35 of the ICC Rules of Arbitration allows a tribunal to issue […]
