• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
ACERIS LAW International Arbitration Law Firm

Aceris Law

International Arbitration Law Firm

  • Aceris Law LLC
  • Outstanding Record
  • Competitive Fees
  • Industries
  • Our Lawyers
  • Accolades
  • Jobs
  • News
  • Contact

ICSID Arbitration

SAUR INTERNATIONAL SA V. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/04/4)

06/06/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

SAUR INTERNATIONAL SA V. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA

The Claimant in this case was a subsidiary of Société d’Aménagement Urbain et Rural, S.A., specializing in water production, water treatment, water distribution and sanitization. The Claimant had participated and won a bid by the Province of Mendoza to privatize the Argentinian company Obras Sanitarias Mendoza (“OSM”). OSM and the Province then signed a concession […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Clause, Argentina Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Investment Arbitration

GETMA INTERNATIONAL, NCT NECOTRANS, GETMA INTERNATIONAL INVESTISSEMENTS & NCT INFRASTRUCTURE & LOGISTIQUE v. THE REPUBLIC OF GUINEA – ICSID 28 June 2012

05/06/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

GETMA INTERNATIONAL

This decision relates to the Respondent’s request to disqualify one of the arbitrators, namely Mr. Bernardo M. Cremades, who had been appointed by the Claimant. The Claimant had filed for arbitration at the ICSID on 29 September 2011 under the ICSID Convention and the Investment Code of the Republic of Guinea. The Parties agreed that […]

Filed Under: Award on Costs, ICSID Arbitration, OHADA Arbitration

IMPREGILO S.P.A. V. ARGENTINE REPUBLIC (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/07/17) – AWARD of 21 June 2011

03/06/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

IMPREGILO S.P.A. V. ARGENTINE REPUBLIC

In 1996, Claimant was awarded a contract for a concession to privatize the water and sewer services of the Province of Buenos Aires. To execute the contract, Claimant incorporated AGBA (an Argentinean company). Under the contract, AGBA acquired the exclusive right to collect, treat, transport, distribute and commercialize water and sewage and, in return, was […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Clause, Argentina Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration

MALICORP LIMITED V. THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/08/18) – AWARD

02/06/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

Malicorp v Egypt

The dispute between Malicorp Ltd, an English Company, and the Republic of Egypt, arose out of the allegedly illegal termination of a concession contract amounting to a violation of the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Egypt of 1975 (the “BIT”). In 2000, Malicorp was awarded a […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Clause, Award on Costs, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Commercial Arbitration, Egypt Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration

ATA CONSTRUCTION, INDUSTRIAL AND TRADING COMPANY V. THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN (ICSID CASE ARB/08/2) AWARD 18 May 2010

30/05/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

https://www.international-arbitration-attorney.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/ATA-CONSTRUCTION2c-INDUSTRIAL-AND-TRADING-COMPANY-V.-JORDAN.pdf

In this ICSID case Claimant, a Turkish company, started an arbitration in relation to a dispute with the Arab Potash Company (“APC”), a Jordan government-owned company, arising out of the collapse of a dike Claimant had built. On 30 September 2003, a FIDIC Tribunal issued an award entirely in favor of Claimant. Following this ruling, […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration, Jordan Arbitration, Turkey Arbitration

FRAPORT AG FRANKFURT AIRPORT SERVICES WORLDWIDE V. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES (ICSID CASE NO.ARB/03/25) – DECISION ON THE APPLICATION FOR ANNULMENT – 23 December 2010

28/05/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

FRAPORT AG FRANKFURT AIRPORT SERVICES WORLDWIDE V. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

This dispute concerned Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide’s (“Fraport”) application for annulment of an ICSID award issued on 16 August 2007. This arbitral award had been the result of a dispute in relation to a concession agreement for the construction and operation of a terminal at the international airport in Manila. In 2002, Respondent, […]

Filed Under: Bilateral Investment Treaty, Germany Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Philippines Arbitration

BURIMI SRL AND EAGLE GAMES SH.A V. REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA (ICSID CASE NO. ARB/11/18) AWARD – 28 May 2013

28/05/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

BURIMI SRL AND EAGLE GAMES SH.A V. REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA

This ill-fated case was governed by the Agreement for the Promotion and Protection of Investments concluded between Italy and the Albania (“BIT”), Albania’s Foreign Investment Law (“FIL”) and the ICSID Convention and Arbitration Rules. In 2004, Eagle Games, a lottery tickets company, applied for a gambling permit from Albania’s Finance Ministry and was awarded a […]

Filed Under: Albania Arbitration, Arbitration Clause, Bilateral Investment Treaty, ICSID Arbitration

VANNESSA VENTURES LTD. V. THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA (ICSID CASE NO ARB (AF)/04/6) – AWARD 16 January 2013

24/05/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

VANNESSA VENTURES LTD. V. THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA

On 16 January 2013, an Arbitral Tribunal rendered an award dismissing all claims on the merits of the Canadian company Vanessa Ventures Ltd in relation to its investment in a mining project in Venezuela, under a bilateral investment treaty between Canada and Venezuela. At the beginning of the 1990’s, Placer Dome Inc (“PDI”) had contracted […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Clause, Canada Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

OPIC KARIMUM CORPORATION V. THE BOLIVARIAN REPUBLIC OF VENEZUELA (ICSID CASE No. ARB/10/14) – DECISION ON THE PROPOSAL TO DISQUALIFY PROFESSOR PHILIPPE SANDS, ARBITRATOR, MAY 5, 2011

22/05/2017 by Aceris Law LLC

Decision on the Proposal to Disqualify Professor Philippe Sands, Arbitrator

This decision concerns the rejection of a challenge to the arbitrator Professor Phillipe Sands, who had been appointed by Respondent, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. The challenge was made by Claimant on the basis that Phillipe Sands had been appointed previously by Respondent, and also previously by Respondent’s counsel, as arbitrator in ICSID and non-ICSID […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Clause, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Go to page 10
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

Logo Aceris Law white

Providing the Highest-Quality Legal Representation in International Arbitration, Globally

Europe | Middle East | Africa | Asia | Oceania | North America | South America

Languages

© 2014-2026 · Aceris Law LLC · Legal Notice